Mango Network vs. Other Layer-1 Blockchains: A Technical Comparison

3 min readFeb 14, 2025

Introduction

The Layer-1 blockchain space is evolving rapidly, with projects competing to solve challenges related to scalability, cross-chain performance, and transaction fees. While Ethereum, Solana, and Aptos have made significant contributions to the industry, Mango Network introduces a unique Multi-VM Omnichain approach that sets it apart.

1. Multi-VM Omnichain Support

Mango Network

Mango Network integrates OPStack and MoveVM while maintaining EVM compatibility. This approach allows developers to:

Build on both EVM and MoveVM environments, increasing flexibility.
Achieve seamless cross-chain execution between different VMs.
Reduce fragmentation by enabling projects to operate across multiple chains.

How It Compares:

Blockchain Virtual Machine Support Key Strengths Ethereum EVM Largest smart contract ecosystem, but lacks cross-VM support. Solana Solana VM High-speed transactions, but limited compatibility with other chains. Aptos MoveVM Security-focused but lacks broad cross-chain support. Mango Network MoveVM + EVM Omnichain execution with cross-VM interoperability.

Mango Network’s multi-VM approach bridges the gap between Ethereum’s smart contract ecosystem and MoveVM’s security and efficiency.

2. Cross-Chain Performance

Mango Network

By integrating MoveVM and EVM, Mango Network allows:
✅ Seamless asset transfers across different chains.
✅ Optimized contract execution with minimal latency.
✅ Unified liquidity pools across networks.

How It Compares:

Ethereum: Limited cross-chain capabilities, relying on bridges like LayerZero.
Solana: Some cross-chain solutions exist, but ecosystem fragmentation remains an issue.
Aptos: Move-based architecture provides security, but interoperability is still developing.

Mango Network’s native omnichain execution gives it an edge in cross-chain efficiency, reducing the need for third-party bridges.

3. Scalability

Mango Network

With multi-threaded execution and layered architecture, Mango Network achieves high transaction throughput while maintaining decentralization.

TPS (Transactions Per Second): Up to 297,450 TPS
Optimized state sharding for parallel processing.

How It Compares:

Blockchain TPS Scalability Method Ethereum 15–30 Layer 2 rollups, but mainnet remains slow. Solana ~65,000 High TPS, but frequent network congestion. Aptos ~160,000 Move-based parallel execution. Mango Network 297,450 Multi-threaded execution & sharding.

Mango Network’s scalability surpasses its competitors by combining MoveVM optimizations with omnichain support.

4. Transaction Fees

Mango Network

Mango’s Layer 2 OP-Mango design helps reduce transaction fees by:
✅ Processing transactions off-chain before mainnet settlement.
✅ Leveraging MoveVM’s efficient execution model.

How It Compares:

Ethereum: High gas fees due to congestion.
Solana: Low fees, but network instability can impact cost efficiency.
Aptos: Moderate fees, but liquidity fragmentation affects cost-effectiveness.

Mango’s low-fee structure ensures cost-efficient transactions while maintaining high security.

Final Thoughts

Mango Network combines the best features of existing Layer-1 blockchains while introducing a unique Multi-VM Omnichain infrastructure.

Here’s how it stacks up against its competitors:
✅ Multi-VM support (MoveVM + EVM) → Unparalleled cross-chain execution.
✅ Superior scalability → 297,450 TPS, exceeding Ethereum, Solana, and Aptos.
✅ Optimized transaction fees → Leveraging OP-Mango for cost efficiency.
✅ Seamless omnichain interoperability → Reducing reliance on external bridges.

As the blockchain space evolves, Mango Network is positioning itself as one of the most advanced and interoperable Layer-1 ecosystems in Web3.